tree 37df71256b2474d7298c24ff6f2706e570ac53f6
parent c5143241fb90939fd0441cf3dcf6313946a4cdd7
author Marc Kupietz <kupietz@ids-mannheim.de> 1788623445 +0200
committer Marc Kupietz <kupietz@ids-mannheim.de> 1788630109 +0200

DocPrompting: Prompt the way a user would

What these tests send is also what we implicitly recommend, and it had
grown into something nobody would type: the task appeared twice, once
before the Readme and once after it, in two slightly different wordings,
with the documentation wedged in between. It now appears once, after the
documentation, where an instruction belongs when the context is long.

The persona goes with it. "You are an expert R programmer" moves the
wording of an answer rather than its correctness, and what was actually
wanted - clear tidyverse code, in the style of the Readme's own examples
- is now asked for. Asking for a single code block addresses at its
source what extract_r_code() has to repair afterwards.

Removing the repetition cost the collocation task its second mention of
"lemma", which turned out to be carrying it: the answers fell back to the
word form. That is a gap in the Readme rather than in the prompt, and is
fixed in the commit before this one; three runs pass with both changes in
place.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I85c8256d6c066768bd816af28fd4c1c78f969169